Subscribe:Posts Comments

You Are Here: Home » Europe and the EU » EU: “Human Rights” and “Democracy” Denied to its Own Dissenters

Non-violent and non-abusive freedom of expression in speech, writing and on the internet is denied to residents of European Union member states despite public claims to the contrary, Andrew Brons MEP has said.

Speaking in the European Parliament during a debate on human rights, Mr Brons said that the “The High Representative spoke of the importance of freedom of thought and expression and free use of and access to the internet in all countries — but not apparently in member states of the EU.

“Non-violent and non-abusive freedom of expression in speech, writing and on the internet on academic subjects is denied even in member states of the EU,” Mr Brons pointed out.

“Political parties that have no connection with violence or terrorism are banned in founder members of the European Union.

“The recent discovery of a murderous Nazi gang in Germany quite rightly attracted utter condemnation and concern among the security services that were unaware of it,” Mr Brons said.

“However, the announcement from Mrs Merkel that she would use this vile terrorist group as a pretext, for seeking to ban a political party, with which it had no connection, was an appalling indictment of that country.

“It shows that the current leadership of Germany has learnt nothing from its unfortunate history,” he added.

Share

5 Comments

  1. An excellent speech by Andrew Brons, who tells it the way it is. Germany in particular has a disgraceful history of repressing dissent, and imprisoning men and women engaged in no more than historical inquiry. If “revisionists” are wrong (the more extreme amongst them probably are wrong) then their faults of methodology can be exposed in open debate. The truth does not need the criminal law to stifle lies. Dirty little orthodoxies composed of half-truths and exaggerations might.

  2. Constip says:

    Bit off subject but have done a search on BBC news about the attack on Rhea Page who was attacked by a muslim gang who were let off, and also on the Congo election result protesters, who attacked carol singers in Trafalgar Square and tried to set fire to the Xmas tree (story on telegraph) – No results found website. Why were these truly terrible events not covered by the BBC at all? How are people going to realise the state of this country if there is this censorship of events? Can anything be done?

  3. paul rim says:

    We are led by a cynical, amoral, diabolical elite which has contempt for democracy & offers only liberty to those who support it.The real, nationalist opposition is vilified, marginalised & criminalised by a deliberate conspiracy of the media, the judiciary & the political establishment. I would once have shouted paranoia here, but 7 years in the BNP taught me what a filthy sham our freedom has become.

  4. Vita Brevis says:

    ‘Human Rights’ in their modern incarnation are a device used by leftists and liberals to trump majority rights where these conflict with cultural marxism.

    They are fundamentally anti-democractic and therefore potentially a source of serious civil disturbance.

  5. We don’t need no stinking human rights act, we have the British Constitution to protect us, if only more people knew we had one.

    Common Law.
    http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/british-constitution/common-law

    How the control us.

    http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/article/legal-fiction-how-they-control-us

Leave a Reply

© 2011 Nationalist Unity Forum · Subscribe:PostsComments · · Powered by WordPress